NEW DELHI: Terming the contents of a page hosted on Wikipedia as "prima facie contemptuous," Delhi HC ordered the platform Wednesday to take it down within 36 hours.
The page had criticised a earlier order directing Wikipedia to reveal names of users who wrote alleged defamatory content against a news agency.
"We are of view that description of order and the judge is prima facie contemptuous and amounts to interference in proceedings," noted a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, ordering removal of page. It ordered the removal of posts discussing the ongoing hearing on Wikipedia.
"The court was disturbed to note that observations made during the last hearing were opened for discussion on the website, compounding the contempt," HC remarked. Senior advocate Akhil Sibal , representing Wikipedia, stated that neither the page commenting on the judge's order nor the discussion page were created by the platform.
During the hearing on Wikipedia's appeal against the earlier order, the bench asked Sibal if the platform would act against malicious comments. Sibal replied that comments would be removed if directed by the court, citing the platform's self-regulation policy.
However, HC remained unconvinced, pointing out that "safe harbour" protection under the new IT Rules doesn't apply since Wikipedia refused to reveal user details despite a court order .
The defamation suit accuses Wikipedia of allowing edits labeling the news agency as a "propaganda tool" for the govt and seeks removal of the content and Rs 2 crore in damages.
The page had criticised a earlier order directing Wikipedia to reveal names of users who wrote alleged defamatory content against a news agency.
"We are of view that description of order and the judge is prima facie contemptuous and amounts to interference in proceedings," noted a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, ordering removal of page. It ordered the removal of posts discussing the ongoing hearing on Wikipedia.
"The court was disturbed to note that observations made during the last hearing were opened for discussion on the website, compounding the contempt," HC remarked. Senior advocate Akhil Sibal , representing Wikipedia, stated that neither the page commenting on the judge's order nor the discussion page were created by the platform.
During the hearing on Wikipedia's appeal against the earlier order, the bench asked Sibal if the platform would act against malicious comments. Sibal replied that comments would be removed if directed by the court, citing the platform's self-regulation policy.
However, HC remained unconvinced, pointing out that "safe harbour" protection under the new IT Rules doesn't apply since Wikipedia refused to reveal user details despite a court order .
The defamation suit accuses Wikipedia of allowing edits labeling the news agency as a "propaganda tool" for the govt and seeks removal of the content and Rs 2 crore in damages.
You may also like
'Hooch' claims 12 lives in Bihar; 2 held
Interdisciplinary Photographic Study Explores Patterns Of Domestic Abuse In South Asian Community Through Ancient Torture-Inspired Art
18-yr-old found dead with acid burns in Bengal, fiance arrested
Pack of howling wolves spotted right outside man's window - sparking surprising two-word reaction
Death in Paradise fans fans 'fill the void' as they find 'perfect' series replacement
Arsenal kickstart new era with victory after manager's shock resignation
Liverpool has no choice over next action as Real Madrid make Trent Alexander-Arnold decision
Post Visa Exemption, Indian Tourists In Malaysia Set To Cross 1 Million Mark Breaking Pre-Covid Record
Ayushman Bharat Scheme: Hospital Suptn. To Issue Letters To Resolve Fingerprint Issues Of Patients
'Popular' man, 22, dies suddenly as family and friends issue heart-wrenching tribute
Nithya Menen Responds To Sai Pallavi Fans Who Felt Gargi Actress Deserved National Award: There's Always Opinions - EXCL
Millet Fair Highlights Importance Of Fortified Foods & Healthy Eating
Honour killing case: SC cuts death to life term
Gujarat structures razed to clear land grab: Govt
Joel Glazer avoids awkward Gary Neville meeting after 'toxic' Man Utd rant
FP Follow Up: Controversial Halloween Party At Historic KEM Building Sparks Outrage, Political Figures Involved
Man, 20, gets hit by massive wave and dragged into sea while taking photos
'No Revenue Case To Remain Pending For Over 3 Months', Collector Asheesh Singh Gave Instructions To Revenue Officers
PK fields Army ex-vice chief Krishna Singh for Bihar bypoll
Mumbai: FIR Registered Against 'V Unbeatable' Dance Group's Manager For Cheating And Forgery After High Court Intervention